Roquemore Skierski PLLC

Practice Areas

Dallas Shareholder Dispute Lawyer

Roquemore Skierski represents Dallas shareholders and closely held businesses in high-stakes shareholder disputes, protecting voting power, access to information, and the value of ownership from early intervention through trial.

Unmatched Local Knowledge |  100+ Years of Combined Experience  |  24/7 Availability

SCHEDULE A CONSULTATION

A shareholder dispute often begins quietly, with missed meeting notices, delayed financial statements, or sudden changes to compensation. Before long, the conflict threatens control, profit, and the company’s future. Speaking with a Dallas shareholder dispute lawyer early will help you understand your rights, protect evidence, and set an agenda that keeps the business stable while the conflict is resolved.

 

Roquemore Skierski PLLC represents business owners, executives, and minority shareholders across Texas in high-stakes disputes. When we take on a case, you will get a plan that matches the real problem. We focus on stabilizing decision-making, reducing financial risk, and building leverage for your case.

How Roquemore Skierski PLLC Guides a Shareholder Dispute

Our process starts with a focused review of the formation documents, board actions, and the events that triggered the disagreement. We outline your options in plain English, explain likely timelines, and set immediate goals such as restoring access to information or preventing further dilution. If negotiation is possible, we prepare a structured proposal backed by the facts. When litigation is necessary, we file promptly, pursue targeted discovery, and seek court orders that preserve the business. Our shareholder dispute attorneys are equipped to handle a range of matters, including:

 

  • Denial of voting rights
  • Improper board or officer removal
  • Minority shareholder squeeze-outs
  • Misuse of company funds
  • Breach of shareholder agreements and bylaws
  • Disputes over distributions, compensation, and financial controls
  • Books-and-records conflicts and accounting disputes
  • Deadlock and governance breakdowns in closely held companies
  • Ownership and equity disputes
  • Claims tied to stock purchases, sales, or misstatements

 

Throughout the matter you will receive direct updates, clear cost expectations, and legal strategy aligned with your business priorities.

What responsible shareholders should do when a dispute occurs

Your shareholder agreement and company bylaws will dictate how a dispute is handled, define thresholds for major actions, and describe limits like rights of first refusal. These documents also control quorum rules, notice requirements, director elections, and buy-sell triggers if separation becomes necessary. You should read every operative clause and test proposed actions against the text so a procedural mistake does not weaken your position.

 

Early on, you should also protect the business record. That means preserving emails, texts, bank records, and financial reports, and limiting informal side agreements that create confusion later. A clean paper trail helps you move faster in negotiation and, if needed, in court.

Choosing between direct and derivative claims in a closely held company

Direct claims are brought by an owner to address a harm to that owner, such as being denied voting rights, being removed from a board seat without proper authority, or being blocked from distributions promised by governing documents. Remedies can include access to voting, reinstatement to office, targeted injunctions, or damages paid to the owner.

 

Derivative claims are brought by owners on the company’s behalf to address a harm to the company, such as overpayment to an insider vendor, diversion of a contract opportunity, or misuse of corporate funds. 

 

Any recovery belongs to the company and may include repayment, unwinding transactions, governance changes, or controls that prevent a repeat. In many matters, the best solution is a practical blend of governance fixes, repayment, adjusted distributions, and a buyout structured under workable valuation terms, with court orders available when negotiation fails.

How bylaws and shareholder agreements help resolve disputes

Governing documents do more than describe ownership. They can determine who can call meetings, what notice is required, how votes are counted, how directors can be removed, and what happens when owners reach deadlock. They also may include transfer restrictions, tag-along and drag-along rights, and dispute-resolution clauses that shape where and how the conflict must be resolved.

 

A disciplined read of these documents often creates immediate leverage. When the other side is cutting procedural corners, enforcing the rules can stop rushed transactions and bring everyone back to the table.

How we move shareholder disputes toward durable business outcomes

Our work aligns legal steps with the company’s long-term goals. We stabilize operations, ground decisions in the governing documents, and request proportionate court relief when it protects value. 

 

We design discovery around the decisions that matter, build credible valuation frameworks when an exit is on the table, and structure settlement options that preserve customers and teams. If trial is required, we present documents first and conclusions second so the decision maker can see how the company operates in practice.

Frequently asked questions

FAQ's

Often, yes. Your governing documents may grant inspection rights, and Texas law can provide additional information rights in certain circumstances. When the other side refuses, court-ordered inspection or a focused audit may be an option.

A court can issue early orders to prevent harm while the case is evaluated, including temporary restraining orders and temporary injunctions. In more limited situations, the court may appoint a receiver with a defined scope to protect the business.

Not always. Your shareholder agreement or bylaws may require mediation, arbitration, or a specific forum. Even when litigation is filed, many cases resolve through negotiated governance fixes, repayment terms, and buyouts once both sides see the strengths and risks of the evidence.

Attorney Kelvin Roquemore

Kelvin Roquemore

Business Litigation Lawyer

Case Results

Mergers & Acquisitions, Business Sale

Our client, an owner operator, engaged us to negotiate and execute the sale of her hospice in Mequite, Texas to a national entity for $450,000. We coordinated due diligence and sucessfully negotiated the final terms of a deal and transition, so patient care continued without interruption and existing staff remained in place. 

Partnership Dispute, Misuse of Funds

Our client started a retail business with two partners. Without his knowledge, his partners excluded him from ownership paperwork and used his personal credit card to cover business expenses, and charged nearly $25,000 to the account. After filing a demand letter and TRO, our client was able to recover the misused funds. 

Commercial Real Estate, Breach of Contract

Our client, the largest tenant in a development, signed a lease with landlord who subsequently sold the property to a new landlord. The new landlord harrassed our client and fabricated a reason to terminate his lease, destroying our Client’s business. Roquemore Skierski was hired to collect damages.

Breach of Contract, Failure to Pay

Our client entered into an agreement with the defendant to perform fulfillment services for a fee. Despite a clear obligation, the defendant breached the contract by failing to pay. Roquemore Skierski was been retained to collect what was due under the contract, including damages, unjust enrichment and promissory estoppel. 

Commercial Real Estate, Failure to Pay

Our client, a commercial landlord, settled with a former tenant who breached his lease with an executed agreed judgement. The tenant subsequently breached the terms of his settlement, and Roquemore Skierski was hired to handle the post-judgment collection of the amounts due under the judgment.

Mergers & Acquisitions, Failure to Pay

Our client, a physician, sold his practice and LLC by a promissory note and purchase agreement for $682,000. After closing the deal, the buyer defaulted on their promissory note and failed to make payments. Roquemore Skierski PLLC was hired to enforce the contractural rights, including damages, under the transaction documents.

Commercial Real Estate, Lease Default

Our client, a physician, sold his medical practice, but continued as the landlord to the practice as he owned the building. The buyer of his practice and new tenant defaulted on a 20 year lease after two months. Roquemore Skierski was hired to enforce the lease agreement and collect monetary damages for the breach of contract.

Breach of Fiduciary Duty

Our client invested $50,000 with an investment advisor, who subsequently stopped communicating with clients. Roquemore Skierski was hired to bring claims of fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of contract, and secured a judgment against the advisor for principal paid, the promised return on investment, and attorneys’ fees.

Breach of Contract, Failure to Pay

Our client, a large corporate contractor, performed fiber optic work pursuant to a sub-contractor agreement with a general contractor. The general contractor withheld funds of $200,000 for the work our client performed. Roquemore Skierski was hired to enforce our clients’ contractual rights against the general contactor.

Defense Against TRO

Our client, a commercial lender purchased a defaulted $485,000 note and deed of trust from the originating lender. Upon noticing foreclosure, the debtor filed a lawsuit claiming wrongful foreclosure and secured a TRO. Roquemore Skierski was hired to defend the lawsuit and respond to the TRO, which had dissolved.

Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Fraud

Our clients entered into a startup business to buy and sell real estate. The parties secured a loan to fund operations, which the defendant immediately diverted to a separate company. Although he initially repeatedly promised to return the money, he stopped responding to our clients. Roquemore Skierski was hired to recover the stolen funds.

Schedule A Consultation

First and Last Name(Required)
Consent(Required)

Practice Areas

Your Partner in Legal Success

Talk With a Dallas Shareholder Dispute Attorney Today

If you are facing exclusion from management, sudden dilution, or unanswered questions about the company’s finances, act before it is too late. Roquemore Skierski PLLC PLLC will clarify your rights, stabilize the business, and pursue a result that protects the value you helped create. Call 972-325-6591 or submit our online form to consult with a Dallas shareholder dispute lawyer who will put your interests first.

SCHEDULE YOUR CONSULTATION

While our business litigation attorneys are based in Downtown Dallas, we proudly serve clients in and around Addison, Carrollton, Cedar Hill, Coppell, DeSoto, Farmers Branch, Flower Mound, Forney, Garland, Grand Prairie, Grapevine, Highland Park, Irving, Oak Cliff, Richardson, Rockwall, Rowlett, Royse City, University Park, and the surrounding area. Whether your company is facing a contract dispute, partnership conflict, or other commercial challenge, we deliver strategic counsel and strong representation across the DFW Metroplex.