Fort WOrth Shareholder Dispute Lawyers

Shareholder conflict is a governance problem before it becomes a lawsuit. It starts with questions about who may authorize transactions, how information flows to owners, and which remedies are available when confidence breaks down. The right plan restores operational stability first, then uses a precise reading of the governing documents and Texas law to move the matter toward a business-focused resolution.

Whether it’s a conflict between shareholders, allegations of misrepresentation, or a violation of securities regulations, these matters demand careful handling and a firm grasp of corporate law.

Roquemore Skierski’s Fort Worth shareholder dispute lawyers represent business owners, executives, and minority shareholders across Texas in high-stakes disputes. Our clients are actively involved in their companies; they’re founders, investors, and partners who need legal guidance that’s precise, proactive, and designed to protect ownership and value.

When we take on a case, we bring clarity and direction. Whether you’re enforcing your rights as a shareholder or defending your business against securities claims, we develop legal strategies grounded in experience and built for impact. We understand what’s at stake; your equity, your voice, and your future, and we fight to protect it.

What responsible shareholders should do when a dispute occurs

When conflict develops among owners, shareholders benefit from a measured, document driven response that protects daily operations while the facts are organized. A Fort Worth shareholder dispute lawyer can help confirm current signing authority with banks and key vendors, review payroll and payables calendars so obligations are met on time, and recommend pausing only those extraordinary transactions that could complicate the dispute until the governing documents are analyzed. At the same time, owners should compile a dated set of minutes, written consents, cap table entries, stock ledgers, and side letters that affect voting, transfer rights, or buy sell mechanics. This disciplined work preserves customer confidence and employee stability and produces a reliable chronology that supports negotiation, targeted court relief, or a structured buyout.

How your shareholder agreement and company bylaws will shape the next steps

Your shareholder agreement and company bylaws will dictate how a dispute is handled, define thresholds for extraordinary actions, and describe limits or rights of first refusal. These documents also set quorum rules, notice requirements, director elections, and buy sell triggers if separation becomes necessary. Reading each operative clause and testing proposed actions against the text reduces procedural missteps and creates leverage. A Fort Worth shareholder dispute lawyer will use these provisions to sequence decisions in a way that moves disputing owners toward a practical result.

Court measures that keep the business steady while issues are evaluated

Texas procedure offers calibrated tools that maintain the status quo without deciding final merits. Temporary restraining orders and temporary injunctions may pause asset transfers, protect customer lists and inventory, and maintain banking authority while a judge considers focused affidavits and limited testimony. Where information is blocked, courts can order inspection of records or a targeted accounting so money flows and related party transactions are evaluated on complete data. In limited situations involving deadlock or credible signs of misuse, a narrowly tailored receivership may safeguard operations while the dispute is resolved.

Choosing between direct and derivative claims in a closely held company

Direct claims address harm to the owner, such as denial of voting rights, improper removal from a board seat, or blocked distributions. Derivative claims address harm to the company, including insider overpayments, diversion of opportunities, or misuse of funds, with recovery going to the company. Texas courts may relax certain steps for closely held entities so relief reaches the right place efficiently. Properly mapping each allegation to the correct posture keeps the matter focused and reduces cost.

Where your matter may be heard and why the forum affects timing

Shareholder disputes arising in Fort Worth may proceed in Tarrant County district courts or, when statutory criteria are met, in the Texas Business Court. Venue depends on forum selection clauses, the size and type of claims, and the parties involved. Forum influences scheduling, motion practice, discovery management, and the route for any appeal, so confirming venue early helps set realistic timelines and control cost. A Fort Worth shareholder dispute lawyer will evaluate these factors at the outset.

Texas blue sky rules that can influence leverage in owner disputes

When a company raises capital by selling stock or membership interests, it must either register the offering or rely on a valid exemption. Many private raises use a federal exemption that still requires a short Texas notice filing and fee soon after the first sale in the state. If filings were missed or disclosures were incomplete, investors may seek to unwind a purchase or claim losses, which affects pricing and leverage in buyout discussions. A focused review of the cap table, subscription agreements, Form D, and any Texas notices should be part of early litigation or settlement planning with a Fort Worth shareholder dispute lawyer.

How we move shareholder disputes toward durable business outcomes

Our work remains aligned with your long term business goals. We steady operations, ground decisions in governing documents, and request proportionate court relief when it protects value. Discovery is designed around the decisions that matter, valuation models are built to be credible, and settlement options are structured to preserve customers and teams. If trial is required, documents come first and conclusions follow so the decision maker can see how the company operates in practice.

our Fort Worth Shareholder Dispute lawyers

Kelvin Roquemore

Founding Partner

Kelvin Roquemore is a Founding Partner of Roquemore Skierski, specializing in business and commercial litigation, with experience in business transactions, complex litigation, M&A, and commercial real estate. With over 25 years of in-house counsel and business litigation experience, he brings a strategic approach to supporting owner-operated small and medium-sized enterprises.

Doug Skierski

Founding Partner

Doug Skierski is a Founding Partner of Roquemore Skierski, and is an A/V-rated attorney with over 20 years of experience in bankruptcy, creditors’ rights, receiverships, and commercial litigation. He holds a J.D. from Southern Methodist University School of Law and has a strong background in complex commercial litigation and arbitration.

D. Shawn Stevens

Of Counsel

Dennis Shawn Stevens is a member of Roquemore Skierski with over 20 years of experience representing clients in business litigation, commercial disputes, and insurance-related claims. He holds a J.D. from the University of Houston Law Center and advises businesses on matters involving breach of contract, construction conflicts, and complex commercial torts.

Mark Ivanyo

Of Counsel

Mark Ivanyo has experience in complex commercial litigation, including contract disputes, product liability, and premises-related claims. He has experience representing businesses in state and federal courts, as well as in arbitration and administration. Mark holds a J.D. from South Texas College of Law and holds a B.B.A. in Management from Texas State University.

Alyssa Grissom

Paralegal

Alysa S. Grissom is a paralegal at Roquemore Skierski and is Board Certified in Civil Trial Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization—an achievement held by fewer than 400 paralegals statewide. She holds an A.A. in Government, an A.A.S. in Paralegal Studies from Austin Community College, and a B.A. in Business, magna cum laude, from Concordia University Texas.