Arlington Business Fraud Lawyers for Private and Mid-Sized Companies

Fraud litigation involves serious allegations that can jeopardize reputations, disrupt operations, and result in significant financial loss. From misrepresentation in business deals to complex schemes involving wire fraud or corporate misconduct, these cases often require swift, strategic legal action. Whether you’re the victim of deceptive practices or accused of wrongdoing, the stakes are high, and so is the need for experienced counsel.

Roquemore Skierski’s Arlington fraud litigation lawyers represent business owners, executives, and professionals across Texas in high-stakes fraud matters. Our clients face challenges involving corporate fraud, financial deception, investment scams, and fraudulent communications, and they rely on us to cut through complexity, protect their interests, and pursue real results.

When we take on a fraud case, we bring clarity, urgency, and a litigation strategy tailored to the facts. Whether you’re navigating claims of misrepresentation or investigating internal misconduct, we work to uncover the truth and enforce accountability. Your reputation, your capital, and your business future are worth defending, and our approach is built to do just that.

How internal business fraud develops in a company

Fraud inside a business is often subtle at the beginning. It rarely starts with one dramatic incident but instead builds over time through repeating patterns that seem irregular. An invoice may not match a delivery record, a vendor may be paid without written approval, or revenue might appear in the books without supporting documentation. What looks like a minor error may reveal a larger scheme. A partner could be diverting profits, or a manager may be inflating payroll. An experienced business fraud attorney examines accounting records, operating agreements, and compensation files to uncover where misconduct occurred while helping daily business operations continue without interruption.

Proving business fraud under Texas law

To prove fraud under Texas law, four elements must be established: a false statement or concealed fact, intent, reliance, and resulting financial harm. The clearest way to meet these requirements is with a strong documentary record. Contracts, invoices, ledgers, and other business records, when arranged in chronological order, allow a business fraud lawyer to present a reliable account of events. This timeline of evidence gives judges, arbitrators, or juries a full understanding of the scheme without leaving room for speculation.

Protective measures the court can order early in a case

Fraud places more than money at risk. Customer relationships, confidential information, and access to funds can be jeopardized. Texas courts have the authority to issue early protective measures while a case is still pending. Temporary restraining orders and injunctions can freeze disputed accounts, pause the transfer of property, or protect access to company data. If assets have already been diverted, forensic accountants can trace and recover them. In situations where fraud creates a management deadlock, a receiver may be appointed by the court to oversee the business until the matter is resolved. These early actions stabilize the company long enough for the facts to be gathered.

Remedies for financial recovery after fraud

Texas law provides several remedies to restore losses after fraud has occurred. Courts can award damages, order restitution, or impose a constructive trust on property purchased with company funds. Wrongdoers may also be required to return profits through disgorgement, ensuring they cannot benefit from misconduct. In cases involving breach of fiduciary duty, exemplary damages may also be available where fraud was deliberate or malicious.

When fraud jeopardizes the business itself, courts may appoint a receiver to preserve assets and operations until the dispute is resolved. These remedies provide Arlington business owners with a path to regain stability and recover value after fraud.

The effect of fraud on partnerships and business stability

The consequences of fraud extend beyond financial loss. Trust between partners, investors, and employees often suffers lasting harm once misconduct is discovered. Expansion plans may be delayed, financing agreements may collapse, and internal conflicts over responsibility can intensify. In Arlington, where business reputation and community connections are important, the damage may also spill over to banking relationships, supplier agreements, and customer confidence.

A business fraud attorney works not only to prove wrongdoing but also to help business owners preserve what they have built. Options may include restructuring decision-making authority, negotiating partner buyouts, or dissolving the company when relationships cannot be repaired. Protecting the long-term viability of the business is as important as recovering immediate financial losses.

How governing contracts influence a fraud case

Partnership and operating agreements often contain provisions that directly affect how fraud disputes are resolved. Arbitration requirements may mandate private proceedings, while venue clauses may determine where a case must be filed. These contractual terms can shape the speed and forum of the case. Our Arlington attorneys review company agreements carefully to ensure that filings, discovery, and motions comply with governing documents and avoid unnecessary procedural obstacles.

Where Arlington fraud cases are heard

Business fraud matters arising in Arlington are typically filed in Tarrant County district courts. Depending on the value and type of claim, certain cases may qualify for the Texas Business Court under Chapter 25A of the Texas Government Code, which handles governance and securities disputes above $5 million while excluding consumer and personal injury claims. The forum where a case is filed can significantly influence timelines, discovery scope, and appeal routes.

How Roquemore Skierski manages e-discovery in complex fraud matters

Most business fraud cases today involve digital information. Emails, cloud storage, and text messages often reveal approval paths, contract terms, and hidden losses. Our lead trial lawyer holds advanced credentials in e-discovery and designs collection strategies that capture vital data without disrupting day-to-day business operations. By combining technical knowledge with courtroom advocacy, Roquemore Skierski equips Arlington businesses with the clarity needed to resolve fraud cases effectively.

How Roquemore Skierski resolves a business fraud matter

Resolution begins with careful preservation of evidence and focused investigation. If records are at risk of being altered, immediate court orders may be necessary to protect them. Many fraud cases resolve outside of trial through mediation or arbitration, particularly when contracts require it. These forums provide efficiency and confidentiality, allowing companies to move forward without the burden of prolonged litigation.

If trial becomes necessary, our attorneys prepare thoroughly. We organize financial records, conduct depositions, and work with experts to explain the fraud in detail. This approach gives Arlington business owners the strongest chance at recovering losses and protecting their interests.

our Arlington Business fraud litigation lawyers

Kelvin Roquemore

Founding Partner

Kelvin Roquemore is a Founding Partner of Roquemore Skierski, specializing in business and commercial litigation, with experience in business transactions, complex litigation, M&A, and commercial real estate. With over 25 years of in-house counsel and business litigation experience, he brings a strategic approach to supporting owner-operated small and medium-sized enterprises.

Doug Skierski

Founding Partner

Doug Skierski is a Founding Partner of Roquemore Skierski, and is an A/V-rated attorney with over 20 years of experience in bankruptcy, creditors’ rights, receiverships, and commercial litigation. He holds a J.D. from Southern Methodist University School of Law and has a strong background in complex commercial litigation and arbitration.

D. Shawn Stevens

Of Counsel

Dennis Shawn Stevens is a member of Roquemore Skierski with over 20 years of experience representing clients in business litigation, commercial disputes, and insurance-related claims. He holds a J.D. from the University of Houston Law Center and advises businesses on matters involving breach of contract, construction conflicts, and complex commercial torts.

Mark Ivanyo

Of Counsel

Mark Ivanyo has experience in complex commercial litigation, including contract disputes, product liability, and premises-related claims. He has experience representing businesses in state and federal courts, as well as in arbitration and administration. Mark holds a J.D. from South Texas College of Law and holds a B.B.A. in Management from Texas State University.

Alyssa Grissom

Paralegal

Alysa S. Grissom is a paralegal at Roquemore Skierski and is Board Certified in Civil Trial Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization—an achievement held by fewer than 400 paralegals statewide. She holds an A.A. in Government, an A.A.S. in Paralegal Studies from Austin Community College, and a B.A. in Business, magna cum laude, from Concordia University Texas.

Frequently asked questions

FAQ's

What is fraud litigation?

Fraud litigation involves a civil lawsuit where a business owner alleges that another party intentionally misrepresented or concealed a material fact, causing financial harm when the owner relied on that falsehood.

How does statutory fraud in real-estate or stock transactions differ from common-law fraud?

Statutory fraud claims arise under Texas Business & Commerce Code § 27.01 and apply to real-estate or stock sales; the statute eases proof of scienter and allows exemplary damages without proving intent to deceive.

What is the statute of limitations for fraud in Texas?

Texas fraud claims carry a four-year limitations period under Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.004, but the discovery rule extends the statute of limitations until the fraud could reasonably have been discovered.

What defenses are commonly raised against fraud allegations?

Defendants typically argue lack of misrepresentation, no intent to deceive, absence of reliance, statute of limitations, waiver, or that statements were non-actionable opinions or forward-looking projections that could not be constituted as absolute statements.

How is fraud different from negligent misrepresentation?

Fraud involves intentional deception or a reckless disregard for the truth. By contrast, negligent misrepresentation, as outlined in Section 552 of the Restatement of Torts, arises when someone makes a false statement without exercising reasonable care in verifying its accuracy.

Can a company sue its own officers or employees for fraud?

A Texas corporation may file direct or derivative actions against officers, directors, or employees who commit fraud or breach fiduciary duties, seeking damages or disgorgement.

Are punitive damages available in Texas fraud cases?

Punitive (exemplary) damages are available if clear and convincing evidence shows fraud, malice, or gross negligence; Chapter 41 caps generally limit the award to the greater of $200,000 or two times economic damages plus non-economic damages up to $750,000.

When should I hire a fraud-litigation attorney?

A business owner should engage counsel as soon as suspicious conduct is detected—early legal action preserves electronic evidence, meets limitations deadlines, and increases leverage for settlement or injunctions.