Broken funding commitments, disputed valuations, or ambiguous term-sheet provisions create costly delays. Our Dallas Technology lawyers draft and enforce clear investment and buyout agreements that secure capital while safeguarding control.
Our Dallas technology lawyers represent businesses in all types of matters and disputes
Unresolved equity splits, vesting schedules, or voting rights can paralyze a startup’s decision-making. Our Dallas technology lawyers negotiate, mediate, or litigate partnership conflicts so founders can refocus on growth.
Missed service-level commitments, unpaid invoices, or unauthorized use of code can drain cash and damage customer trust. Our team enforces software and service contracts to restore revenue and protect your platform.
Late component deliveries, defective parts, and price-increase violations threaten production timelines. Our Dallas technology attorneys pursue swift remedies that keep your development pipeline on schedule.
Broken funding commitments, disputed valuations, or ambiguous term-sheet provisions create costly delays. Our Dallas Technology lawyers draft and enforce clear investment and buyout agreements that secure capital while safeguarding control.
Enterprise clients who refuse payment or exceed licensed user limits can erode margins. Our Dallas Technology lawyers pursue collections, specific performance, or damages to uphold your software-license and service-subscription terms.
Broken funding commitments, disputed valuations, or ambiguous term-sheet provisions create costly delays. Our Dallas Technology lawyers draft and enforce clear investment and buyout agreements that secure capital while safeguarding control.
From API licensing and managed-services statements of work to reseller, distribution, and channel-partner agreements, our Dallas technology lawyers craft airtight contracts that allocate risk, preserve IP rights, and reduce litigation exposure across every area of the business.
Escalating rents, hidden CAM fees, or relocation disputes can disrupt operations. Our Dallas technology attorneys negotiate, revise, and enforce office and colocation leases that align with growth plans and cash-flow targets.
Our Dallas technology lawyers represent businesses in all types of matters and disputes
Unresolved equity splits, vesting schedules, or voting rights can paralyze a startup’s decision-making. Our Dallas technology lawyers negotiate, mediate, or litigate partnership conflicts so founders can refocus on growth.
Missed service-level commitments, unpaid invoices, or unauthorized use of code can drain cash and damage customer trust. Our team enforces software and service contracts to restore revenue and protect your platform.
Late component deliveries, defective parts, and price-increase violations threaten production timelines. Our Dallas technology attorneys pursue swift remedies that keep your development pipeline on schedule.
Broken funding commitments, disputed valuations, or ambiguous term-sheet provisions create costly delays. Our Dallas Technology lawyers draft and enforce clear investment and buyout agreements that secure capital while safeguarding control.
From API licensing and managed-services statements of work to reseller, distribution, and channel-partner agreements, our Dallas technology lawyers craft airtight contracts that allocate risk, preserve IP rights, and reduce litigation exposure across every area of the business.
Escalating rents, hidden CAM fees, or relocation disputes can disrupt operations. Our Dallas technology attorneys negotiate, revise, and enforce office and colocation leases that align with growth plans and cash-flow targets.
Conflicts often revolve around equity vesting, intellectual-property ownership, decision-making authority, and dilution in later funding rounds.
The founder should collect system logs, document unpaid invoices or unauthorized use, and send formal notice under the contract’s cure provisions. Prompt legal action maintains leverage for settlement or court enforcement.
The startup can negotiate term sheets that cap board seats, limit protective provisions, and include drag-along and tag-along rights that favor the founders. Thorough counsel review ensures financing aligns with long-term control goals.
A purchase agreement for a technology business should address earn-out formulas, representations on intellectual-property ownership, non-compete covenants, employee-retention bonuses, and post-closing indemnities. Escrow holdbacks can safeguard against undisclosed liabilities.
Texas law provides four years from the date of breach to file suit on a written contract. Acting quickly protects evidence and bargaining power.
A well-drafted operating agreement can include rotating casting votes, buy-sell triggers, or mandatory mediation. Without such mechanisms, the co-founders may need judicial dissolution or appointment of a receiver.
Arbitration offers privacy and faster timelines but can be costly and provides limited grounds for appeal. The dispute-resolution clause should reflect the parties’ bargaining strength, need for confidentiality, and tolerance for cost.
A Texas startup should execute work-for-hire agreements that assign all intellectual-property rights in the code to the company. The contract should include confidentiality clauses, venue and choice-of-law provisions favoring Texas courts, and explicit restrictions on reuse of code. Regular code-audit checkpoints and secure repository access further reduce exposure.
A software-escrow agreement places source code with a neutral escrow agent who releases it to the customer only if predefined triggers occur, such as vendor insolvency or failure to meet support obligations. Escrow gives enterprise customers business-continuity protection while allowing the vendor to keep its code proprietary.
A well-drafted SLA should cap damages at a multiple of the monthly service fee, exclude consequential damages, and offer predefined credits as the sole remedy for downtime. Clear notification and cure periods give the provider an opportunity to correct issues before the customer may terminate or sue.
While our business litigation attorneys are based in Dallas, we proudly serve clients in and around Dallas, Arlington, Denton, Fort Worth, Frisco, McKinney, and Plano. Within Dallas, we have worked with businesses in Addison, Carrollton, Cedar Hill, Coppell, DeSoto, Farmers Branch, Flower Mound, Forney, Garland, Grand Prairie, Grapevine, Highland Park, Irving, Oak Cliff, Richardson, Rockwall, Rowlett, Royse City, University Park, and the surrounding area. Whether your company is facing a contract dispute, partnership conflict, or other commercial challenge, we deliver strategic counsel and strong representation across the DFW Metroplex.