Roquemore Skierski PLLC

Practice Areas

Plano Construction Defect Lawyer

Roquemore Skierski defends Dallas businesses with sharp counsel and tough courtroom advocacy, protecting your bottom line from formation to complex disputes.

Unmatched Local Knowledge |  100+ Years of Combined Experience  |  24/7 Availability

Construction defect disputes arise when construction work, design work, materials, or project supervision fails to meet the standards required by the contract, applicable codes, or manufacturer requirements. A Plano construction defect lawyer often sees commercial projects become difficult to unwind because a single property can involve a developer, a property owner, a general contractor, multiple subcontractors, design professionals, suppliers, lenders, and insurers, each operating under a different contract, scope, and risk allocation.

 

Residential disputes raise different issues because Texas law imposes a pre-suit process for many homeowner claims and because habitability concerns can drive urgent decisions about inspection and repair. A Plano construction defect attorney can help evaluate the defect conditions, identify the responsible scopes in the construction chain, and organize the project record needed to pursue repair and recovery.

 

Roquemore Skierski PLLC represents real estate investors, developers, property owners, general contractors, construction companies, and homeowners in construction defect disputes. Our firm handles matters involving both patent defects, which are apparent on reasonable inspection, and latent defects, which surface later through water intrusion, movement, or system failure.

Construction Defects Roquemore Skierski PLLC Can Handle in Plano

Construction defects often show up as performance failures and repeat damage rather than a single broken component. A Plano construction defect lawyer can assist clients with defect allegations and defect claims involving:

 

  • Design defects and coordination failures
  • Water leakage and water damage
  • Defective roofing, flashing, or window installation
  • Building envelope failures, including façade and waterproofing issues
  • Electrical defects and mechanical defects, including HVAC performance problems
  • Product and material defects and failures
  • Manufacturing defects in building components
  • Physical damage to buildings, including damage tied to moisture intrusion or improper sequencing
  • Structural damage or structural errors, including framing and load path issues
  • Lateral support and sub-adjacent support claims
  • Breach of warranties, including express warranties and implied warranties when applicable
  • Deceptive Trade Practices Act claims where the statute applies to the parties and the conduct

Determining responsibility for a construction defect

Construction defects can affect completed projects in ways ranging from cosmetic problems to catastrophic collapse with tragic human toll. When a defect, failure, or collapse occurs, contractors, designers, and owners may each be exposed to liability, depending on how each participant carried out responsibilities during the construction process.

 

Commercial liability is frequently shaped by contractual risk shifting. Indemnity provisions, insurance requirements, and related contract language often control who must defend whom and how disputes will be resolved. A Plano construction defect attorney often evaluates responsibility by mapping the defect theory to contract scope, sequencing decisions reflected in the project documentation, and the technical findings that explain causation.

Why the visible damage may not be the defect

A defect is often different from the condition that first appears on the structure, although both generally must be corrected. The visible condition is the manifestation of the defect, meaning the observable evidence of a deeper problem. For example, although a stucco crack may appear to be the defect, the crack may only reflect a deeper issue.

 

The underlying defect might be inadequate structural support, improper materials, improper subsurface preparation, or inadequate expansion joints. Movement of the supporting structure, the foundation, or the underlying earth may also be a manifestation of underlying defects such as inadequate foundation reinforcement, soil compaction problems, or improper attachment of structural components. A Plano construction defect lawyer can help ensure the claim focuses on the defect itself, rather than a surface-level symptom that does not explain the failure.

Recurring categories of construction defects

In a broad sense, a construction defect is any element of a structure that fails to perform as intended or fails to conform to the contract requirements. Common categories include the following.

 

Departures from plans and specifications

 

Every construction project is built based on drawings and specifications that tell the contractor what to build and the quality of the materials to use. Construction project drawings include plans prepared by architects, surveyors, and consulting engineers, along with more detailed drawings prepared by contractors, subcontractors, or suppliers that are submitted and approved through the project design process. The specifications supplied with the plans often provide additional detail not evident from the drawings, including material requirements, performance criteria, and methods of application. Any material deviation from the plans or specifications is a defect, even when the work appears clean and even when systems perform in the short term.

 

A project system does not work as intended

 

A construction defect exists where the structure or any of its systems do not work as intended. This includes failure to meet performance criteria, sudden failure of a part of a project, or any aspect of a project that does not work as it should, including roof leaks, foundation leaks, plumbing leaks, or excessive settlement. A Plano construction defect attorney can help determine whether the failure involves workmanship, design, materials, or a combination of causes supported by the record.

 

Code and safety compliance problems

 

All construction must comply with construction and safety standards imposed by law. Failure to comply can constitute a defect in the design, the construction work, or both, even if the structure or systems appear to function. Code noncompliance can also expand repair scope and increase disruption because corrective work often requires invasive access to confirm conditions and complete repairs.

 

Premature deterioration and early failure

 

Premature deterioration of a project element may be the result of a construction defect. A roof intended to last twenty years that begins deteriorating after five can support a defect theory depending on the materials, installation, exposure conditions, and maintenance record. Timing matters because the same visible condition can reflect a defect early in a component’s life cycle or ordinary wear and tear later.

 

Express and implied warranties in construction defect disputes

 

Construction contracts often contain express warranties that give rise to contractual liability when they are breached. Warranty language frequently controls scope, notice requirements, and remedies, which makes warranty analysis central in both commercial and residential disputes.

 

Texas law may also impose implied warranties. An implied warranty is an obligation imposed by law rather than written into the contract. Some implied warranties can be disclaimed, while residential disputes often raise implied warranty issues more directly.

 

Two implied warranties commonly arise in residential construction cases:

 

  • The implied warranty of good workmanship
  • The implied warranty of habitability

 

The implied warranty of good workmanship provides a warranty to the owner of a construction project, repair, or modification of existing property that it will be performed in a good and workmanlike manner. “Good and workmanlike” means the quality of work must be equal to the work performed by someone who has the knowledge, training, or experience necessary for the successful practice of a trade or occupation when judged by someone capable of judging such work.

 

The implied warranty of habitability provides that the good and workmanlike performance of the builder must result in a building that is habitable for residential use and that is safe, sanitary, and fit for human habitation at the time of the sale of a new house.

Attorney Kelvin Roquemore

Kelvin Roquemore

Commercial Real Estate Lawyer

Schedule A Consultation

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
First and Last Name(Required)
Consent(Required)

Practice Areas

Your Partner in Legal Success

Talk with a Plano construction defect attorney

When a defect surfaces on a commercial project or in a home, the earlier experienced counsel becomes involved, the more options often remain available for documenting conditions, identifying responsible scopes, and pursuing a resolution that supports long-term use and value. Roquemore Skierski PLLC helps Plano-area investors, developers, property owners, contractors, and homeowners protect valuable property interests, reduce disruption, and pursue a practical outcome.

 

Contact Roquemore Skierski PLLC at 972-325-6591 to speak with a Plano construction defect lawyer.

While our business litigation attorneys are based in Downtown Dallas, we proudly serve clients in and around Addison, Carrollton, Cedar Hill, Coppell, DeSoto, Farmers Branch, Flower Mound, Forney, Garland, Grand Prairie, Grapevine, Highland Park, Irving, Oak Cliff, Richardson, Rockwall, Rowlett, Royse City, University Park, and the surrounding area. Whether your company is facing a contract dispute, partnership conflict, or other commercial challenge, we deliver strategic counsel and strong representation across the DFW Metroplex.