Roquemore Skierski defends Dallas businesses with sharp counsel and tough courtroom advocacy, protecting your bottom line from formation to complex disputes.
- Home
- »
- Sachse Business Litigation Lawyer
Roquemore Skierski defends Dallas businesses with sharp counsel and tough courtroom advocacy, protecting your bottom line from formation to complex disputes.
Unmatched Local Knowledge | 100+ Years of Combined Experience | 24/7 Availability
Business disputes can quickly affect revenue, ownership rights, customer relationships, and the day-to-day operation of a company. The Sachse business litigation attorneys at Roquemore Skierski PLLC represent businesses and business owners in high-stakes disputes with a focus on practical results, disciplined litigation strategy, and case preparation built for trial from the outset. The firm draws on more than a century of collective Texas practice and represents clients in state and federal courts, including the Texas Business Court, as well as in complex arbitrations involving regional, national, and international matters.
When the exposure is serious, legal strategy should account for both the legal claims and the business consequences surrounding them. A Sachse business litigation lawyer should evaluate the dispute in light of operational pressure, ownership concerns, contractual obligations, and the effect the matter may have on future business plans. Roquemore Skierski PLLC approaches business litigation with that perspective, pursuing efficient resolution when it serves the client’s interests while preparing each case in a way that keeps the business ready for court if negotiation does not produce an acceptable result.
The firm’s litigation practice is built for owners and operators who remain closely involved in the businesses they run. That includes professional practices, construction companies, e-commerce businesses, real estate ventures, and established operating companies with substantial contractual and financial exposure. Roquemore Skierski PLLC aligns litigation strategy with operational priorities, cash flow concerns, and long-term business objectives so the client can make informed decisions as the dispute moves forward.
Roquemore Skierski PLLC handles litigation for closely held businesses, owner-operated companies, and growing enterprises across Texas. Many of these disputes involve multiple parties, overlapping claims, and proceedings that may continue in more than one court or forum. The firm staffs matters in a way that supports accountability and responsiveness, with a supervising partner, a lead attorney responsible for day-to-day case strategy and execution, and a dedicated paralegal managing logistics and case flow. That structure gives each client direct access to a business litigation attorney who remains actively involved as the matter develops.
Representative matters include the following:
A business should retain a business litigation lawyer once a dispute begins to threaten money, control, or reputation in a material way. That point may arise when a demand letter is received, a lawsuit or arbitration is filed, a partner cuts off access to bank accounts or company systems, funds appear to have been diverted, customers begin to be solicited away, or unpaid obligations start to disrupt operations.
Early involvement also matters when a court order may be necessary to stop ongoing harm, when records and communications should be preserved before they are lost, or when a contract’s arbitration clause, venue provision, or attorneys’ fees language could materially shape the course of the dispute. Early legal analysis can preserve leverage, reduce avoidable expense, and give the business a clearer understanding of its options before the case becomes more expensive and more difficult to control.
Roquemore Skierski PLLC begins by identifying the client’s commercial objectives, litigation risk, timing pressures, and budget limits. The firm then structures pleadings, discovery, motion practice, and settlement efforts around those priorities. That approach keeps the dispute tied to the business result that matters most instead of allowing procedure to dictate the representation.
Many disputes can be resolved through disciplined early action, direct negotiation, or targeted motion practice. At the same time, the firm prepares cases with trial in mind when the facts, the law, and the conduct of the opposing side make that necessary. Opposing parties and their counsel should understand from the outset that the case will be handled with seriousness. A business litigation attorney can add value at this stage by identifying what should be pursued immediately and what should wait until the evidentiary record is more fully developed.
The firm’s litigation practice reflects long familiarity with Texas courts and the broader legal system. Its lead attorneys have practiced law for decades, and many remain active in organizations tied to the profession and the administration of justice, including the J.L. Turner Legal Association, Texas Bar College, Law Firm Anti-Racism Alliance, Alliance for Professional Counselors, and the Hon. John C. Ford American Inn of Court.
For businesses in Sachse and the surrounding North Texas area, local context can affect both timing and litigation strategy. Commercial disputes can proceed through different trial courts, arbitration forums, and business settings depending on the parties, the contract, and the relief requested. A business litigation lawyer who regularly litigates in North Texas can better evaluate venue considerations, court expectations, and the speed with which urgent relief may need to be pursued.
For an initial consultation, it helps to have a concise timeline of the dispute, a clear sense of the amount at issue, and an informed view of the preferred outcome. Relevant contracts, amendments, emails, demand letters, notices, account records, and any filed pleadings can also help counsel evaluate the situation more efficiently, even in a short consultation.
In Texas, many breach of contract claims are governed by a four-year statute of limitations, and fraud claims often carry the same four-year deadline. Claims involving injury to personal or real property are commonly subject to a two-year limitations period. A statute of limitations is the legal deadline to file suit. Some business claims may involve different deadlines, shorter contractual notice periods, or accrual disputes, which is why early review is often important.
Business litigation costs vary based on the complexity of the dispute, the number of witnesses, the volume of documents, the need for expert analysis, and the length of the proceeding. Some matters may be resolved for a relatively modest amount through early negotiation or targeted motion practice, while larger and more fact-intensive cases can require substantial investment over time. Attorneys’ fees, filing fees, expert witness costs, discovery expenses, and trial preparation all affect total cost.
In some cases, a prevailing party may recover reasonable attorneys’ fees. Whether fees are available depends on the type of claim, the governing contract, and applicable Texas law. For example, Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code § 38.001 may permit recovery of reasonable fees in certain contract-based suits.

Business Litigation Lawyer
Our client, an owner operator, engaged us to negotiate and execute the sale of her hospice in Mequite, Texas to a national entity for $450,000. We coordinated due diligence and sucessfully negotiated the final terms of a deal and transition, so patient care continued without interruption and existing staff remained in place.
Our client started a retail business with two partners. Without his knowledge, his partners excluded him from ownership paperwork and used his personal credit card to cover business expenses, and charged nearly $25,000 to the account. After filing a demand letter and TRO, our client was able to recover the misused funds.
Our client, the largest tenant in a development, signed a lease with landlord who subsequently sold the property to a new landlord. The new landlord harrassed our client and fabricated a reason to terminate his lease, destroying our Client’s business. Roquemore Skierski was hired to collect damages.
Our client entered into an agreement with the defendant to perform fulfillment services for a fee. Despite a clear obligation, the defendant breached the contract by failing to pay. Roquemore Skierski was been retained to collect what was due under the contract, including damages, unjust enrichment and promissory estoppel.
Our client, a commercial landlord, settled with a former tenant who breached his lease with an executed agreed judgement. The tenant subsequently breached the terms of his settlement, and Roquemore Skierski was hired to handle the post-judgment collection of the amounts due under the judgment.
Our client, a physician, sold his practice and LLC by a promissory note and purchase agreement for $682,000. After closing the deal, the buyer defaulted on their promissory note and failed to make payments. Roquemore Skierski PLLC was hired to enforce the contractural rights, including damages, under the transaction documents.
Our client, a physician, sold his medical practice, but continued as the landlord to the practice as he owned the building. The buyer of his practice and new tenant defaulted on a 20 year lease after two months. Roquemore Skierski was hired to enforce the lease agreement and collect monetary damages for the breach of contract.
Our client invested $50,000 with an investment advisor, who subsequently stopped communicating with clients. Roquemore Skierski was hired to bring claims of fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of contract, and secured a judgment against the advisor for principal paid, the promised return on investment, and attorneys’ fees.
Our client, a large corporate contractor, performed fiber optic work pursuant to a sub-contractor agreement with a general contractor. The general contractor withheld funds of $200,000 for the work our client performed. Roquemore Skierski was hired to enforce our clients’ contractual rights against the general contactor.
Our client, a commercial lender purchased a defaulted $485,000 note and deed of trust from the originating lender. Upon noticing foreclosure, the debtor filed a lawsuit claiming wrongful foreclosure and secured a TRO. Roquemore Skierski was hired to defend the lawsuit and respond to the TRO, which had dissolved.
Our clients entered into a startup business to buy and sell real estate. The parties secured a loan to fund operations, which the defendant immediately diverted to a separate company. Although he initially repeatedly promised to return the money, he stopped responding to our clients. Roquemore Skierski was hired to recover the stolen funds.
Roquemore Skierski PLLC represents businesses at different stages of growth and understands that litigation strategy should support the company’s broader commercial goals. The firm provides practical and strategic counsel designed to protect ownership interests, preserve operations, and position the client for a sound business outcome.
If a dispute is escalating or immediate court relief may be necessary, Roquemore Skierski PLLC can be reached at 972-325-6591.
While our business litigation attorneys are based in Dallas, we proudly serve clients in and around Dallas, Arlington, Denton, Fort Worth, Frisco, McKinney, and Plano. Within Dallas, we have worked with businesses in Addison, Carrollton, Cedar Hill, Coppell, DeSoto, Farmers Branch, Flower Mound, Forney, Garland, Grand Prairie, Grapevine, Highland Park, Irving, Oak Cliff, Richardson, Rockwall, Rowlett, Royse City, University Park, and the surrounding area. Whether your company is facing a contract dispute, partnership conflict, or other commercial challenge, we deliver strategic counsel and strong representation across the DFW Metroplex.